diff options
| author | Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> | 2021-05-24 20:59:32 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2021-05-25 17:32:35 -0700 |
| commit | bad2e478af3b4df9fd84b4db7779ea91bd618c16 (patch) | |
| tree | b2739a3cb481bc0f9ea4745ba21393e02924a32e /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/link_pinning.c | |
| parent | 5981881d21dff612abf8fce484f8efa67f49aae4 (diff) | |
| download | linux-bad2e478af3b4df9fd84b4db7779ea91bd618c16.tar.gz linux-bad2e478af3b4df9fd84b4db7779ea91bd618c16.tar.bz2 linux-bad2e478af3b4df9fd84b4db7779ea91bd618c16.zip | |
selftests/bpf: Turn on libbpf 1.0 mode and fix all IS_ERR checks
Turn ony libbpf 1.0 mode. Fix all the explicit IS_ERR checks that now will be
broken because libbpf returns NULL on error (and sets errno). Fix
ASSERT_OK_PTR and ASSERT_ERR_PTR to work for both old mode and new modes and
use them throughout selftests. This is trivial to do by using
libbpf_get_error() API that all libbpf users are supposed to use, instead of
IS_ERR checks.
A bunch of checks also did explicit -1 comparison for various fd-returning
APIs. Such checks are replaced with >= 0 or < 0 cases.
There were also few misuses of bpf_object__find_map_by_name() in test_maps.
Those are fixed in this patch as well.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210525035935.1461796-3-andrii@kernel.org
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/link_pinning.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/link_pinning.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/link_pinning.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/link_pinning.c index a743288cf384..6fc97c45f71e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/link_pinning.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/link_pinning.c @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ void test_link_pinning_subtest(struct bpf_program *prog, int err, i; link = bpf_program__attach(prog); - if (CHECK(IS_ERR(link), "link_attach", "err: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(link))) + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "link_attach")) goto cleanup; bss->in = 1; @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ void test_link_pinning_subtest(struct bpf_program *prog, /* re-open link from BPFFS */ link = bpf_link__open(link_pin_path); - if (CHECK(IS_ERR(link), "link_open", "err: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(link))) + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "link_open")) goto cleanup; CHECK(strcmp(link_pin_path, bpf_link__pin_path(link)), "pin_path2", @@ -84,8 +84,7 @@ void test_link_pinning_subtest(struct bpf_program *prog, CHECK(i == 10000, "link_attached", "got to iteration #%d\n", i); cleanup: - if (!IS_ERR(link)) - bpf_link__destroy(link); + bpf_link__destroy(link); } void test_link_pinning(void) |