summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>2022-12-01 00:58:01 +0100
committerAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>2022-12-06 10:52:41 +0100
commit09f9b4418e417b6452d1bcd7a9544a68fc1e59d5 (patch)
tree6ccdd48748ef6c98bf1adc8f7ea58e74dfe225e9 /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display
parentf2053d346615f2c6bb4c0663276274b2da3f6871 (diff)
downloadlinux-09f9b4418e417b6452d1bcd7a9544a68fc1e59d5.tar.gz
linux-09f9b4418e417b6452d1bcd7a9544a68fc1e59d5.tar.bz2
linux-09f9b4418e417b6452d1bcd7a9544a68fc1e59d5.zip
drm/i915: Limit the display memory alignment to 32 bit instead of 64
The coming commit "drm/i915: Introduce guard pages to i915_vma" from Chris, was originally changing display_alignment to u32 from u64. The reason is that the display GGTT is and will be limited o 4GB. Put it in a separate patch and use "max(...)" instead of "max_t(64, ...)" when asigning the value. We can safely use max as we know beforehand that the comparison is between two u32 variables. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221130235805.221010-2-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.c
index 6900acbb1381..1aca7552a85d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ intel_pin_fb_obj_dpt(struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
goto err;
}
- vma->display_alignment = max_t(u64, vma->display_alignment, alignment);
+ vma->display_alignment = max(vma->display_alignment, alignment);
i915_gem_object_flush_if_display(obj);