diff options
| author | Monk Liu <Monk.Liu@amd.com> | 2016-09-27 16:39:58 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> | 2016-10-25 14:38:23 -0400 |
| commit | 4c2b2453ef9be2e105a987cd13cf3ce14e53f5e0 (patch) | |
| tree | b96f0d2e60cecaa71b44d3ceda72ff50629fa4bf /drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cgs.c | |
| parent | bed5712e1a52bb5d177722bc0d76c2a3a71b8338 (diff) | |
| download | linux-4c2b2453ef9be2e105a987cd13cf3ce14e53f5e0.tar.gz linux-4c2b2453ef9be2e105a987cd13cf3ce14e53f5e0.tar.bz2 linux-4c2b2453ef9be2e105a987cd13cf3ce14e53f5e0.zip | |
drm/amdgpu:properly fix some JumpTable issues
we found some MEC ucode leads to IB test fail or even
ring test fail if Jump Table of it is not start in
FW bo with page aligned address, fixed by always make
JT address page aligned.
we don't need to patch JT2 for MEC2, because for VI,
MEC2 is a copy of MEC1, thus when converting fw_type
for MEC_JT2 we just return MEC1,hw can use the same
JT for both MEC1 & MEC2.
above two change fixed some ring/ib test failure issue
for some version of MEC ucode.
Signed-off-by: Frank Min <Frank.Min@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Monk Liu <Monk.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cgs.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cgs.c | 21 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cgs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cgs.c index e6b1bf3dc292..34049d67a0d8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cgs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cgs.c @@ -687,11 +687,14 @@ static uint32_t fw_type_convert(struct cgs_device *cgs_device, uint32_t fw_type) result = AMDGPU_UCODE_ID_CP_MEC1; break; case CGS_UCODE_ID_CP_MEC_JT2: - if (adev->asic_type == CHIP_TONGA || adev->asic_type == CHIP_POLARIS11 - || adev->asic_type == CHIP_POLARIS10) - result = AMDGPU_UCODE_ID_CP_MEC2; - else + /* for VI. JT2 should be the same as JT1, because: + 1, MEC2 and MEC1 use exactly same FW. + 2, JT2 is not pached but JT1 is. + */ + if (adev->asic_type >= CHIP_TOPAZ) result = AMDGPU_UCODE_ID_CP_MEC1; + else + result = AMDGPU_UCODE_ID_CP_MEC2; break; case CGS_UCODE_ID_RLC_G: result = AMDGPU_UCODE_ID_RLC_G; @@ -781,12 +784,18 @@ static int amdgpu_cgs_get_firmware_info(struct cgs_device *cgs_device, if ((type == CGS_UCODE_ID_CP_MEC_JT1) || (type == CGS_UCODE_ID_CP_MEC_JT2)) { - gpu_addr += le32_to_cpu(header->jt_offset) << 2; + gpu_addr += ALIGN(le32_to_cpu(header->header.ucode_size_bytes), PAGE_SIZE); data_size = le32_to_cpu(header->jt_size) << 2; } - info->mc_addr = gpu_addr; + + info->kptr = ucode->kaddr; info->image_size = data_size; + info->mc_addr = gpu_addr; info->version = (uint16_t)le32_to_cpu(header->header.ucode_version); + + if (CGS_UCODE_ID_CP_MEC == type) + info->image_size = (header->jt_offset) << 2; + info->fw_version = amdgpu_get_firmware_version(cgs_device, type); info->feature_version = (uint16_t)le32_to_cpu(header->ucode_feature_version); } else { |