Merge tag 'acpi-5.20-rc1-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm

Pull more ACPI updates from Rafael Wysocki:
 "These fix up direct references to the fwnode field in struct device
  and extend ACPI device properties support.

  Specifics:

   - Replace direct references to the fwnode field in struct device with
     dev_fwnode() and device_match_fwnode() (Andy Shevchenko)

   - Make the ACPI code handling device properties support properties
     with buffer values (Sakari Ailus)"

* tag 'acpi-5.20-rc1-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm:
  ACPI: property: Fix error handling in acpi_init_properties()
  ACPI: VIOT: Do not dereference fwnode in struct device
  ACPI: property: Read buffer properties as integers
  ACPI: property: Add support for parsing buffer property UUID
  ACPI: property: Unify integer value reading functions
  ACPI: property: Switch node property referencing from ifs to a switch
  ACPI: property: Move property ref argument parsing into a new function
  ACPI: property: Use acpi_object_type consistently in property ref parsing
  ACPI: property: Tie data nodes to acpi handles
  ACPI: property: Return type of acpi_add_nondev_subnodes() should be bool

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/viot.c b/drivers/acpi/viot.c
index 647f11cf165d..6132092dab2a 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/viot.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/viot.c
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static int __init viot_get_pci_iommu_fwnode(struct viot_iommu *viommu,
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	fwnode = pdev->dev.fwnode;
+	fwnode = dev_fwnode(&pdev->dev);
 	if (!fwnode) {
 		/*
 		 * PCI devices aren't necessarily described by ACPI. Create a
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int __init viot_get_pci_iommu_fwnode(struct viot_iommu *viommu,
 		}
 		set_primary_fwnode(&pdev->dev, fwnode);
 	}
-	viommu->fwnode = pdev->dev.fwnode;
+	viommu->fwnode = dev_fwnode(&pdev->dev);
 	pci_dev_put(pdev);
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ static int viot_dev_iommu_init(struct device *dev, struct viot_iommu *viommu,
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	/* We're not translating ourself */
-	if (viommu->fwnode == dev->fwnode)
+	if (device_match_fwnode(dev, viommu->fwnode))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	ops = iommu_ops_from_fwnode(viommu->fwnode);