Merge branch 'tip/perf/urgent' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace into perf/core

3 files changed, 63 insertions, 16 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 224a84f7080c..0de6b2b31f61 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -593,8 +593,12 @@ static int x86_setup_perfctr(struct perf_event *event)
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Do not allow config1 (extended registers) to propagate,
+	 * there's no sane user-space generalization yet:
+	 */
 	if (attr->type == PERF_TYPE_RAW)
-		return x86_pmu_extra_regs(event->attr.config, event);
+		return 0;
 
 	if (attr->type == PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE)
 		return set_ext_hw_attr(hwc, event);
@@ -616,8 +620,8 @@ static int x86_setup_perfctr(struct perf_event *event)
 	/*
 	 * Branch tracing:
 	 */
-	if ((attr->config == PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS) &&
-	    (hwc->sample_period == 1)) {
+	if (attr->config == PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS &&
+	    !attr->freq && hwc->sample_period == 1) {
 		/* BTS is not supported by this architecture. */
 		if (!x86_pmu.bts_active)
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -1291,6 +1295,16 @@ static int x86_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
 
 	cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
 
+	/*
+	 * Some chipsets need to unmask the LVTPC in a particular spot
+	 * inside the nmi handler.  As a result, the unmasking was pushed
+	 * into all the nmi handlers.
+	 *
+	 * This generic handler doesn't seem to have any issues where the
+	 * unmasking occurs so it was left at the top.
+	 */
+	apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
+
 	for (idx = 0; idx < x86_pmu.num_counters; idx++) {
 		if (!test_bit(idx, cpuc->active_mask)) {
 			/*
@@ -1377,8 +1391,6 @@ perf_event_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
 		return NOTIFY_DONE;
 	}
 
-	apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
-
 	handled = x86_pmu.handle_irq(args->regs);
 	if (!handled)
 		return NOTIFY_DONE;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 8fc2b2cee1da..e61539b07d2c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ struct intel_percore {
 /*
  * Intel PerfMon, used on Core and later.
  */
-static const u64 intel_perfmon_event_map[] =
+static u64 intel_perfmon_event_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_MAX] __read_mostly =
 {
   [PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES]		= 0x003c,
   [PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS]		= 0x00c0,
@@ -391,12 +391,12 @@ static __initconst const u64 nehalem_hw_cache_event_ids
 {
  [ C(L1D) ] = {
 	[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
-		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0f40, /* L1D_CACHE_LD.MESI            */
-		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x0140, /* L1D_CACHE_LD.I_STATE         */
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x010b, /* MEM_INST_RETIRED.LOADS       */
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x0151, /* L1D.REPL                     */
 	},
 	[ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
-		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0f41, /* L1D_CACHE_ST.MESI            */
-		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x0141, /* L1D_CACHE_ST.I_STATE         */
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x020b, /* MEM_INST_RETURED.STORES      */
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x0251, /* L1D.M_REPL                   */
 	},
 	[ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
 		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x014e, /* L1D_PREFETCH.REQUESTS        */
@@ -933,6 +933,16 @@ static int intel_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
 
 	cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
 
+	/*
+	 * Some chipsets need to unmask the LVTPC in a particular spot
+	 * inside the nmi handler.  As a result, the unmasking was pushed
+	 * into all the nmi handlers.
+	 *
+	 * This handler doesn't seem to have any issues with the unmasking
+	 * so it was left at the top.
+	 */
+	apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
+
 	intel_pmu_disable_all();
 	handled = intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer();
 	status = intel_pmu_get_status();
@@ -998,6 +1008,9 @@ intel_bts_constraints(struct perf_event *event)
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 	unsigned int hw_event, bts_event;
 
+	if (event->attr.freq)
+		return NULL;
+
 	hw_event = hwc->config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK;
 	bts_event = x86_pmu.event_map(PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS);
 
@@ -1305,7 +1318,7 @@ static void intel_clovertown_quirks(void)
 	 * AJ106 could possibly be worked around by not allowing LBR
 	 *       usage from PEBS, including the fixup.
 	 * AJ68  could possibly be worked around by always programming
-	 * 	 a pebs_event_reset[0] value and coping with the lost events.
+	 *	 a pebs_event_reset[0] value and coping with the lost events.
 	 *
 	 * But taken together it might just make sense to not enable PEBS on
 	 * these chips.
@@ -1409,6 +1422,18 @@ static __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 		x86_pmu.percore_constraints = intel_nehalem_percore_constraints;
 		x86_pmu.enable_all = intel_pmu_nhm_enable_all;
 		x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_nehalem_extra_regs;
+
+		if (ebx & 0x40) {
+			/*
+			 * Erratum AAJ80 detected, we work it around by using
+			 * the BR_MISP_EXEC.ANY event. This will over-count
+			 * branch-misses, but it's still much better than the
+			 * architectural event which is often completely bogus:
+			 */
+			intel_perfmon_event_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES] = 0x7f89;
+
+			pr_cont("erratum AAJ80 worked around, ");
+		}
 		pr_cont("Nehalem events, ");
 		break;
 
@@ -1425,6 +1450,7 @@ static __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 
 	case 37: /* 32 nm nehalem, "Clarkdale" */
 	case 44: /* 32 nm nehalem, "Gulftown" */
+	case 47: /* 32 nm Xeon E7 */
 		memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, westmere_hw_cache_event_ids,
 		       sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids));
 		memcpy(hw_cache_extra_regs, nehalem_hw_cache_extra_regs,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c
index f4c1da2f9352..ead584fb6a7d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c
@@ -946,14 +946,23 @@ static int p4_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		if (!x86_perf_event_set_period(event))
 			continue;
 		if (perf_event_overflow(event, 1, &data, regs))
-			p4_pmu_disable_event(event);
+			x86_pmu_stop(event, 0);
 	}
 
-	if (handled) {
-		/* p4 quirk: unmask it again */
-		apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, apic_read(APIC_LVTPC) & ~APIC_LVT_MASKED);
+	if (handled)
 		inc_irq_stat(apic_perf_irqs);
-	}
+
+	/*
+	 * When dealing with the unmasking of the LVTPC on P4 perf hw, it has
+	 * been observed that the OVF bit flag has to be cleared first _before_
+	 * the LVTPC can be unmasked.
+	 *
+	 * The reason is the NMI line will continue to be asserted while the OVF
+	 * bit is set.  This causes a second NMI to generate if the LVTPC is
+	 * unmasked before the OVF bit is cleared, leading to unknown NMI
+	 * messages.
+	 */
+	apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
 
 	return handled;
 }