diff options
author | Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> | 2021-10-22 15:32:28 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2021-10-25 14:45:46 -0700 |
commit | 3762a39ce85feb07996f3f0390963da71874c651 (patch) | |
tree | 1dded9713a8024aa450e55139d27b96822a7262a | |
parent | 2c0f51ac320649402a80a6228744eb54f42a5c21 (diff) | |
download | linux-3762a39ce85feb07996f3f0390963da71874c651.tar.gz linux-3762a39ce85feb07996f3f0390963da71874c651.tar.bz2 linux-3762a39ce85feb07996f3f0390963da71874c651.zip |
selftests/bpf: Split out bpf_verif_scale selftests into multiple tests
Instead of using subtests in bpf_verif_scale selftest, turn each scale
sub-test into its own test. Each subtest is compltely independent and
just reuses a bit of common test running logic, so the conversion is
trivial. For convenience, keep all of BPF verifier scale tests in one
file.
This conversion shaves off a significant amount of time when running
test_progs in parallel mode. E.g., just running scale tests (-t verif_scale):
BEFORE
======
Summary: 24/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
real 0m22.894s
user 0m0.012s
sys 0m22.797s
AFTER
=====
Summary: 24/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
real 0m12.044s
user 0m0.024s
sys 0m27.869s
Ten second saving right there. test_progs -j is not yet ready to be
turned on by default, unfortunately, and some tests fail almost every
time, but this is a good improvement nevertheless. Ignoring few
failures, here is sequential vs parallel run times when running all
tests now:
SEQUENTIAL
==========
Summary: 206/953 PASSED, 4 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
real 1m5.625s
user 0m4.211s
sys 0m31.650s
PARALLEL
========
Summary: 204/952 PASSED, 4 SKIPPED, 2 FAILED
real 0m35.550s
user 0m4.998s
sys 0m39.890s
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211022223228.99920-5-andrii@kernel.org
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c | 220 |
1 files changed, 152 insertions, 68 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c index 3d002c245d2b..867349e4ed9e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c @@ -39,82 +39,166 @@ struct scale_test_def { bool fails; }; -void test_bpf_verif_scale(void) -{ - struct scale_test_def tests[] = { - { "loop3.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, true /* fails */ }, - - { "test_verif_scale1.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS }, - { "test_verif_scale2.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS }, - { "test_verif_scale3.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS }, - - { "pyperf_global.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT }, - { "pyperf_subprogs.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT }, - - /* full unroll by llvm */ - { "pyperf50.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT }, - { "pyperf100.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT }, - { "pyperf180.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT }, - - /* partial unroll. llvm will unroll loop ~150 times. - * C loop count -> 600. - * Asm loop count -> 4. - * 16k insns in loop body. - * Total of 5 such loops. Total program size ~82k insns. - */ - { "pyperf600.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT }, - - /* no unroll at all. - * C loop count -> 600. - * ASM loop count -> 600. - * ~110 insns in loop body. - * Total of 5 such loops. Total program size ~1500 insns. - */ - { "pyperf600_nounroll.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT }, - - { "loop1.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT }, - { "loop2.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT }, - { "loop4.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS }, - { "loop5.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS }, - { "loop6.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE }, - - /* partial unroll. 19k insn in a loop. - * Total program size 20.8k insn. - * ~350k processed_insns - */ - { "strobemeta.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT }, - - /* no unroll, tiny loops */ - { "strobemeta_nounroll1.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT }, - { "strobemeta_nounroll2.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT }, - - /* non-inlined subprogs */ - { "strobemeta_subprogs.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT }, - - { "test_sysctl_loop1.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SYSCTL }, - { "test_sysctl_loop2.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SYSCTL }, - - { "test_xdp_loop.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP }, - { "test_seg6_loop.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL }, - }; +static void scale_test(const char *file, + enum bpf_prog_type attach_type, + bool should_fail) +{ libbpf_print_fn_t old_print_fn = NULL; - int err, i; + int err; if (env.verifier_stats) { test__force_log(); old_print_fn = libbpf_set_print(libbpf_debug_print); } - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) { - const struct scale_test_def *test = &tests[i]; - - if (!test__start_subtest(test->file)) - continue; - - err = check_load(test->file, test->attach_type); - CHECK_FAIL(err && !test->fails); - } + err = check_load(file, attach_type); + if (should_fail) + ASSERT_ERR(err, "expect_error"); + else + ASSERT_OK(err, "expect_success"); if (env.verifier_stats) libbpf_set_print(old_print_fn); } + +void test_verif_scale1() +{ + scale_test("test_verif_scale1.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale2() +{ + scale_test("test_verif_scale2.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale3() +{ + scale_test("test_verif_scale3.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_pyperf_global() +{ + scale_test("pyperf_global.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_pyperf_subprogs() +{ + scale_test("pyperf_subprogs.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_pyperf50() +{ + /* full unroll by llvm */ + scale_test("pyperf50.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_pyperf100() +{ + /* full unroll by llvm */ + scale_test("pyperf100.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_pyperf180() +{ + /* full unroll by llvm */ + scale_test("pyperf180.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_pyperf600() +{ + /* partial unroll. llvm will unroll loop ~150 times. + * C loop count -> 600. + * Asm loop count -> 4. + * 16k insns in loop body. + * Total of 5 such loops. Total program size ~82k insns. + */ + scale_test("pyperf600.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_pyperf600_nounroll() +{ + /* no unroll at all. + * C loop count -> 600. + * ASM loop count -> 600. + * ~110 insns in loop body. + * Total of 5 such loops. Total program size ~1500 insns. + */ + scale_test("pyperf600_nounroll.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_loop1() +{ + scale_test("loop1.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_loop2() +{ + scale_test("loop2.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_loop3_fail() +{ + scale_test("loop3.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, true /* fails */); +} + +void test_verif_scale_loop4() +{ + scale_test("loop4.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_loop5() +{ + scale_test("loop5.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_loop6() +{ + scale_test("loop6.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_strobemeta() +{ + /* partial unroll. 19k insn in a loop. + * Total program size 20.8k insn. + * ~350k processed_insns + */ + scale_test("strobemeta.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_strobemeta_nounroll1() +{ + /* no unroll, tiny loops */ + scale_test("strobemeta_nounroll1.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_strobemeta_nounroll2() +{ + /* no unroll, tiny loops */ + scale_test("strobemeta_nounroll2.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_strobemeta_subprogs() +{ + /* non-inlined subprogs */ + scale_test("strobemeta_subprogs.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_sysctl_loop1() +{ + scale_test("test_sysctl_loop1.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SYSCTL, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_sysctl_loop2() +{ + scale_test("test_sysctl_loop2.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SYSCTL, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_xdp_loop() +{ + scale_test("test_xdp_loop.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, false); +} + +void test_verif_scale_seg6_loop() +{ + scale_test("test_seg6_loop.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL, false); +} |