From 4eb150d6122bf51744d07c569ea811e8ce4bdd6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 15:41:19 +0800
Subject: btrfs: unify the error handling pattern for read_tree_block()
We had an error handling pattern for read_tree_block() like this:
eb = read_tree_block();
if (IS_ERR(eb)) {
/*
* Handling error here
* Normally ended up with return or goto out.
*/
} else if (!extent_buffer_uptodate(eb)) {
/*
* Different error handling here
* Normally also ended up with return or goto out;
*/
}
This is fine, but if we want to add extra check for each
read_tree_block(), the existing if-else-if is not that expandable and
will take reader some seconds to figure out there is no extra branch.
Here we change it to a more common way, without the extra else:
eb = read_tree_block();
if (IS_ERR(eb)) {
/*
* Handling error here
*/
return eb or goto out;
}
if (!extent_buffer_uptodate(eb)) {
/*
* Different error handling here
*/
return eb or goto out;
}
This also removes some oddball call sites which uses some creative way
to check error.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
(limited to 'fs/btrfs/backref.c')
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
index c9ee579bc5a6..ebc392ea1d74 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
@@ -789,11 +789,13 @@ static int add_missing_keys(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
if (IS_ERR(eb)) {
free_pref(ref);
return PTR_ERR(eb);
- } else if (!extent_buffer_uptodate(eb)) {
+ }
+ if (!extent_buffer_uptodate(eb)) {
free_pref(ref);
free_extent_buffer(eb);
return -EIO;
}
+
if (lock)
btrfs_tree_read_lock(eb);
if (btrfs_header_level(eb) == 0)
@@ -1335,7 +1337,8 @@ again:
if (IS_ERR(eb)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(eb);
goto out;
- } else if (!extent_buffer_uptodate(eb)) {
+ }
+ if (!extent_buffer_uptodate(eb)) {
free_extent_buffer(eb);
ret = -EIO;
goto out;
--
cgit v1.2.3